Play-to-Earn vs Traditional Gaming: What Really Matters in 2025

Play-to-Earn vs Traditional Gaming: What Really Matters in 2025
15 November 2025 12 Comments Yolanda Niepagen

Play-to-Earn Earnings Calculator

Estimate Your Earnings

Low High
1 5

Traditional Gaming Cost Comparison

Your Estimated Earnings

Monthly Earnings $0.00
Annual Earnings $0.00
Risk Level High
Note: These are estimates. Actual earnings may vary significantly due to token price fluctuations.

By 2025, if you’ve ever spent an evening grinding in a video game hoping to unlock a rare skin or level up your character, you’ve experienced traditional gaming. But now, millions are logging in not just to play-but to earn. Play-to-earn (P2E) games promise real money for time spent, turning your controller into a paycheck. But is it a revolution-or just another gamble dressed up as fun?

What You Actually Own in Each Model

In traditional gaming, you don’t own anything. Not really. When you buy a $60 game like Call of Duty or spend $100 on Fortnite V-Bucks, you’re paying for access, not ownership. The game’s publisher can remove your items, shut down servers, or change rules overnight. A 2024 Consumer Reports survey found that 92% of players didn’t realize they had no legal right to their digital purchases. Your legendary sword? It’s just data on a server you don’t control.

P2E games flip that. With blockchain, your in-game items-weapons, skins, land-are stored as NFTs on a public ledger. That means you truly own them. You can sell them on OpenSea, trade them with friends, or even use them across different games if developers allow it. In Big Time, for example, your gear isn’t locked inside one game-it’s yours, forever. No company can take it away. That’s not just a feature. It’s a fundamental shift in power.

Earning Money vs Spending Money

Traditional gaming makes money by taking it from you. Developers charge upfront ($60 for most AAA titles), then keep pushing microtransactions-battle passes, loot boxes, cosmetic packs. In 2024, the industry made $54.3 billion from these add-ons alone. Players are the product, and the profit stays locked inside the company’s vaults.

P2E games work differently. Instead of paying to play, you get paid. Games like Axie Infinity used to let players earn Smooth Love Potion (SLP) tokens just by winning battles. Those tokens could be sold on exchanges for real money. In 2021, players in the Philippines earned up to $12.50 a day-more than their minimum wage at the time. That’s not a side hustle. For many, it was survival.

But here’s the catch: those earnings aren’t guaranteed. Token prices crash. Axie’s AXS token hit $155 in late 2021. By early 2023, it was $4.20. Players who bought into the hype lost everything. The same thing happened with Squid Game token in 2022-$3.36 million vanished overnight. P2E isn’t a job. It’s a volatile market wrapped in a game.

Who Plays What-and Why

Traditional gaming is for everyone. In 2024, 3.4 billion people played video games worldwide. 54% were male, 46% female. People play for fun, escape, competition, or social connection. The Entertainment Software Association found 78% of players say fun is their main reason.

P2E started as a lifeline for people in places with weak economies. In 2021, 73% of Axie Infinity players came from the Philippines, Venezuela, and Nigeria. Today, that’s down to 52%. More people in the U.S., Europe, and Australia are joining-not because they need the money, but because they’re curious about ownership. Still, a 2025 CoinFantasy survey showed 82% of traditional gamers won’t try P2E because they’re scared of crypto volatility.

And then there’s the burnout factor. A University of California study in 2024 found that 43% of P2E players felt less enjoyment over time. Why? Because playing stopped feeling like fun. It felt like work. One Reddit user, u/Gamer4Life, wrote: “I quit after three months. It felt like a second job without benefits.”

Two gamers in a digital arena — one enjoying a fun game, the other stressed over token swaps, symbolizing fun vs. work.

The Setup: Minutes vs Hours

Getting into traditional gaming? Easy. Buy the game. Install it. Play. 95% of players are up and running in under 15 minutes. No wallets. No crypto. No learning curves.

P2E? It’s a maze. First, you need a crypto wallet-MetaMask or Trust Wallet. Then you need to buy cryptocurrency, usually ETH or BNB, from an exchange. Then you have to find the game’s starter NFTs-some cost $5, others $500. Then you need to understand gas fees (which can run $0.50 to $5 per transaction). Finally, you need to learn how to swap tokens on a decentralized exchange.

Blockchain App Factory’s 2025 analysis says the average new P2E player spends 2-4 hours just to get started. Compare that to Fortnite’s 15-minute onboarding. And support? Traditional games offer 24/7 customer service with a 2-hour response time. P2E? You’re on your own in a Discord server. Half the projects don’t even have beginner guides.

The Future: Web3 Gaming Is Here

The early days of P2E-2020 to 2022-were wild. Games were built around earning first, fun second. That’s why 70% of them failed within 18 months. Players got bored. Tokens crashed. Communities collapsed.

By 2025, the industry learned. The new wave is called Web3 Gaming. It’s not about “play to earn.” It’s about “play and own.” Games like Ember Sword and Illuvium focus on deep gameplay first. Earning is a bonus, not the point. Illuvium uses AI to adjust rewards based on how players behave. Big Time lets you earn by exploring, fighting, and trading-but only if you actually enjoy the game.

The trend is clear: the most successful Web3 games now blend ownership with entertainment. 68% of new projects in 2025 use hybrid models. And analysts predict the term “Web3” will disappear entirely by 2030-not because blockchain is gone, but because it’s just… normal. Like credit cards or email.

A player peacefully exploring a fantasy world in a free Web3 game, with blockchain butterflies and a shadow of financial burden behind them.

Which One Is Right for You?

If you want to relax after work, beat a boss, or team up with friends-stick with traditional gaming. It’s polished, reliable, and designed for fun.

If you’re tech-savvy, understand crypto risks, and want to own your digital stuff-or you’re in a region where gaming income matters-P2E might be worth a try. But don’t go in expecting steady pay. Treat it like a speculative investment with a game attached.

And if you’re just curious? Try a free Web3 game like Big Time or Alien Worlds. No upfront cost. No NFT needed to start. Play for an hour. See if it feels like fun-or like a job.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you really make money playing play-to-earn games in 2025?

Yes-but only in specific cases. A small number of players in emerging markets still earn meaningful income from games like Axie Infinity or StepN, especially if they own multiple NFTs. But for most people in developed countries, earnings are unpredictable and often less than minimum wage after fees and time spent. The days of easy crypto payouts are over. Today’s successful P2E games reward skill and long-term investment, not just grinding.

Are play-to-earn games safe?

Not always. Many P2E projects are scams or poorly designed. The Squid Game token collapse wiped out millions in 2022. Even legitimate games can fail if their token economy crashes. Always research the team, check token supply, and never invest more than you can afford to lose. Treat it like gambling-not a job. Also, avoid games that demand huge upfront NFT purchases. That’s a red flag.

Do I need to know about cryptocurrency to play P2E games?

Yes. You’ll need a crypto wallet (like MetaMask), understand how to buy tokens, pay gas fees, and use decentralized exchanges. If you don’t know what a private key is, you’re at risk of losing your assets forever. There’s no customer support hotline if you send funds to the wrong address. The learning curve is real. Traditional gaming doesn’t require any of this.

What’s the difference between P2E and Web3 Gaming?

P2E is the old model: play to earn money. Web3 Gaming is the new model: play to own. Web3 games still use blockchain and NFTs, but earning isn’t the main goal. Fun, story, and gameplay come first. Earning is a side benefit. Games like Big Time and Illuvium are examples. The shift happened because players got tired of games that felt like work. Web3 Gaming is about freedom-not financial pressure.

Why are so many P2E games failing?

Most early P2E games had broken economies. They paid out more tokens than they took in, creating inflation. Players bought NFTs to start, but couldn’t earn enough to replace them. When new players stopped joining, the system collapsed. BNB Chain’s 2025 report found 70% of early P2E games died within 18 months. The survivors? They fixed their tokenomics. They added real gameplay. They stopped treating players like ATMs.

Is traditional gaming dying because of P2E?

No. The traditional gaming market was worth $221 billion in 2024. P2E made $4.7 billion. That’s less than 2.5%. AAA titles like Call of Duty and Elden Ring still dominate. But traditional games are starting to take notes. Some are testing NFTs for cosmetic items or player-owned skins. They’re not going full Web3-but they’re watching. The future might be hybrid: fun games with optional ownership.

What’s the best way to start with P2E games?

Start free. Try games like Alien Worlds or Big Time-they let you play without buying NFTs. Use a free wallet like MetaMask. Learn how to swap tokens on a decentralized exchange like Uniswap. Only spend money after you’ve played for weeks and understand the economy. Never invest your rent money. And remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it is.

12 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Derayne Stegall

    November 16, 2025 AT 14:15

    Bro just tried Big Time for an hour and I’m already hooked 😎 No upfront cost, no stress, just vibes and loot. This is what gaming should feel like again.

  • Image placeholder

    Ryan Hansen

    November 17, 2025 AT 01:26

    Look, I get the appeal of owning your stuff - I’ve lost too many skins to server shutdowns to trust EA or Activision anymore. But let’s be real: most P2E games still feel like a grind with extra steps. I played Axie for two weeks, spent $300 on NFTs, and ended up making $12 in SLP after gas fees. That’s not a job, that’s a hobby with a tax form. The new Web3 games? Way better. They actually let you enjoy the game first. Illuvium’s combat mechanics alone are worth the learning curve. If you’re gonna dive in, start with free tiers. Don’t buy in until you’ve watched at least five YouTube tutorials and read the whitepaper. And please, for the love of god, don’t use your rent money. I’ve seen too many people get burned.

  • Image placeholder

    Aayansh Singh

    November 18, 2025 AT 12:25

    Pathetic. You people still think this is about gaming? It’s a crypto Ponzi dressed up with pixel art. The fact that you call it ‘ownership’ is laughable. NFTs are just JPEGs with a blockchain label. You’re not owning anything - you’re trusting a team of anonymous devs who could rug pull tomorrow. And don’t get me started on the Philippines ‘earnings’ narrative. That was a bubble fueled by desperation. Now it’s collapsing under its own weight. Stop romanticizing financial ruin as ‘innovation.’

  • Image placeholder

    Shanell Nelly

    November 19, 2025 AT 02:50

    Hey everyone - if you’re curious about Web3 gaming but scared of crypto, I’ve got your back! Start with Alien Worlds - it’s free, no NFT needed, and the UI is actually kinda fun. You can mine TLM, vote on proposals, and even duel others. I started with zero knowledge and now I understand wallets and gas fees without crying. Also, use CoinGecko to track token prices - don’t just chase hype. And if you’re on a budget? Save up $20, not $200. You can still have fun without going all in. You got this 💪

  • Image placeholder

    Rebecca Amy

    November 20, 2025 AT 07:39

    So… like… do you even need to play? Or is it just buying NFTs and waiting for the price to go up? Feels like stock market but with dragons.

  • Image placeholder

    Astor Digital

    November 20, 2025 AT 16:59

    As someone who grew up in a country where internet access is a luxury, I’ve seen how P2E changed lives. My cousin in Manila used to work 12-hour shifts at a call center. He started playing Axie on his phone during breaks. In six months, he bought a used laptop, paid off his sister’s medical debt, and started teaching other locals how to play. Yeah, the token crashed. Yeah, he lost money. But he didn’t lose the skills. He learned crypto, blockchain, how to negotiate trades, how to spot scams. That’s not a game - that’s a bootcamp for the digital economy. The West calls it gambling. The Global South calls it survival with Wi-Fi. We need to stop judging what we don’t understand.

  • Image placeholder

    Darren Jones

    November 20, 2025 AT 23:16

    Just a quick note: if you’re considering trying Web3 gaming, please - PLEASE - write down your private key on paper and store it in a fireproof safe. Do not screenshot it. Do not store it in Google Drive. Do not email it to ‘yourself.’ I’ve seen too many people lose everything because they thought ‘I’ll remember it.’ You won’t. I’ve helped five people recover from this mistake. Don’t be the sixth. Also, use hardware wallets if you can afford it. Ledger or Trezor. Not just MetaMask on your phone. And always test with $5 before you go big. Seriously. Your future self will thank you.

  • Image placeholder

    Kathleen Bauer

    November 22, 2025 AT 16:33

    ok so i tried big time last night and like… i didnt even know what a wallet was before. but i just clicked ‘play for free’ and it worked?? i got a dumb little sword and i’ve been running around collecting sparkles for 2 hours. its weirdly chill. i dont care if i make money. i just like that i can keep the sword. like… its mine? not the company’s? idk im just vibin. also i spelled ‘vibin’ wrong but u get it 😅

  • Image placeholder

    Carol Rice

    November 23, 2025 AT 07:50

    STOP. JUST STOP. You people are treating blockchain like it’s a free lottery ticket. This isn’t ‘fun’ - it’s financial risk with extra clicks. And you’re all acting like it’s cute that some guy in the Philippines is ‘earning’ $10 a day? That’s exploitation dressed in NFT glitter. The companies are banking on desperation. And you? You’re the enablers. You think you’re ‘supporting innovation’? You’re just feeding the machine. If you want to own your stuff, buy a PC and mod it yourself. At least then you’re not handing your money to a team of devs who’ll vanish when the token hits zero.

  • Image placeholder

    Gaurang Kulkarni

    November 25, 2025 AT 00:57

    P2E is dead. Web3 gaming is the future. The old models collapsed because they were built on greed. New games focus on gameplay first. Tokenomics second. That’s why Illuvium and Ember Sword are surviving. No one cares about earning anymore. They care about depth. Strategy. Worldbuilding. The crypto part is just infrastructure now. Like HTTP. No one talks about HTTP. They just use the web. Same thing will happen here. Stop clinging to 2021.

  • Image placeholder

    Usama Ahmad

    November 25, 2025 AT 20:00

    Hey I’m from India and I tried Big Time last month. Took me 3 days to figure out the wallet and gas fees but now I just play for fun. Got a cool hat, traded it for a pet, made a friend in Canada. No money made. But I had fun. That’s enough for me.

  • Image placeholder

    Nathan Ross

    November 25, 2025 AT 20:27

    It is my considered opinion, based on empirical observation and economic analysis, that the paradigm shift from traditional gaming to Web3 gaming represents not merely a technological evolution, but a reconfiguration of the social contract between consumer and publisher. The proprietary model, while monetarily efficient, has demonstrated systemic fragility in terms of digital asset permanence. Conversely, blockchain-based ownership, despite its current infrastructural inefficiencies, offers a durable, decentralized framework for digital property rights. That said, the current user experience remains suboptimal. The onboarding process is unnecessarily labyrinthine. One must possess a priori knowledge of cryptographic principles, which are not intuitive to the average consumer. Thus, while the theoretical framework is sound, the practical implementation requires significant UX refinement before mass adoption becomes viable. In conclusion: the future is promising, but the present is cumbersome.

Write a comment