Single-Sided vs Dual-Sided Liquidity in DeFi: What You Need to Know in 2025
Impermanent Loss & Yield Calculator
Compare Single-Sided vs Dual-Sided Liquidity
See how price movements affect your yield and impermanent loss across both liquidity models.
Results
How This Works
Single-Sided: Only exposed to risk of your deposited asset. Lower impermanent loss (58.7% reduction per Vitalik's analysis) but stops earning fees if price moves outside your range.
Dual-Sided: Earns fees regardless of price movement but exposes you to impermanent loss on both tokens. Risk increases significantly with large price swings.
Imagine you want to earn fees by lending your crypto to a decentralized exchange - but you only have USDC. You don’t want to buy ETH just to join a pool. That’s where single-sided liquidity comes in. It lets you lend just one token and still earn trading fees. No need to pair it with another asset. This wasn’t possible until 2021. Now, it’s reshaping how people interact with DeFi.
On the other side, dual-sided liquidity is the old way: you deposit two tokens in equal value - say, $500 in ETH and $500 in USDC - and let the protocol use them to facilitate trades. It’s simple, but risky. If ETH’s price swings wildly, you could lose money even if you’re earning fees. That’s called impermanent loss. And it’s not theoretical. In July 2023, one user lost 12.7% on a dual-sided ETH/USDC position after a 30% price drop.
How Single-Sided Liquidity Actually Works
Single-sided liquidity doesn’t mean you’re depositing one token into a pool with no other assets. It means you’re depositing one token, and the protocol handles the rest. Uniswap v3, launched in May 2021, made this possible with something called concentrated liquidity. Instead of spreading your USDC across every possible price from $0.50 to $5.00, you pick a narrow range - say, $0.99 to $1.01. The system automatically converts your USDC into other tokens (like SOL or ETH) as the price moves within that range, so trades can happen smoothly.
Think of it like setting up a vending machine that only sells soda when the price is between $1.00 and $1.02. If the price jumps to $1.05, your machine stops selling - and you stop earning fees. But while it’s working, you’re using 100% of your capital efficiently. That’s why Uniswap v3 can achieve up to 4,000x better capital efficiency than v2 within tight ranges. You’re not wasting half your money on tokens you don’t care about.
Protocols like Bancor were doing something similar as early as 2017, but they used different mechanics. Today, Uniswap v3 and v4 dominate. v4, launched in July 2023, added “hooks” - smart contract plugins that let you automate rebalancing, adjust fees dynamically, or even lock in profits when price moves out of range. This isn’t just a feature. It’s a game-changer for people who don’t want to watch charts all day.
Why Dual-Sided Liquidity Still Matters
Dual-sided pools are the backbone of DeFi. Uniswap v2, SushiSwap, and PancakeSwap v2 still hold billions in locked value. Why? Because they’re predictable. You deposit two tokens. You earn fees on every trade. No range to set. No rebalancing. No risk of your liquidity going idle.
But here’s the catch: you’re exposed to impermanent loss on both sides. If ETH goes up 30%, your pool gets flooded with more ETH and less USDC. When you withdraw, you end up with less value than if you’d just held the tokens. In 2023, over 60% of new LPs who used dual-sided pools reported losing money to impermanent loss - even when they earned 18% APY in fees.
Still, dual-sided pools have one big advantage: depth. If someone wants to trade $50,000 worth of ETH for USDC, a dual-sided pool can handle it with less slippage than a single-sided pool with a narrow range. That’s why institutional traders still rely on them. Uniswap v2 pools show 37% lower slippage for large trades than concentrated single-sided positions, according to Chainport.io’s 2023 analysis.
Impermanent Loss: The Hidden Killer
Impermanent loss is the silent thief of DeFi. It doesn’t steal your money outright - it just makes your pool worth less than if you’d held your tokens in your wallet. And it hits dual-sided liquidity hardest.
With single-sided liquidity, you’re only exposed to the risk of your one asset. If you deposit USDC and the price of SOL crashes, you’re not losing value on your USDC. You’re just not earning fees until SOL comes back into your price range. That’s why Vitalik Buterin found in 2022 that single-sided models reduce average impermanent loss by 58.7% compared to traditional pools.
But even single-sided isn’t risk-free. If you set your range too wide - say, $10 to $50 for a token trading at $25 - you’re basically doing dual-sided liquidity with extra steps. If you set it too narrow - $0.999 to $1.001 for USDC - a tiny depeg during the March 2023 banking crisis can freeze your position. One Reddit user reported having to rebalance twice during that event.
Yield, Efficiency, and Real-World Returns
Let’s talk numbers. In Q3 2023, analysts at SnapX tracked 12 major DeFi protocols. Dual-sided pools offered 10-25% APY in fees. Single-sided pools? Only 2-5%. But here’s the twist: those 2-5% were earned with 100% of your capital working. In dual-sided, half your capital is tied up in a token you might not even believe in.
Take a USDC-only position on Uniswap v3 with a ±0.5% range. In stable markets, it earned 6.2% monthly returns - that’s over 70% APY - with zero impermanent loss. That’s not a fluke. It’s the math of concentrated liquidity. You’re not competing with every other LP across the entire price curve. You’re the only one in your lane.
But during volatility? Your position goes silent. If ETH drops 20% and your range is $1,800-$2,200, you earn nothing until it comes back. That’s why 52% of negative reviews mention “low returns during stable markets.” It’s not a flaw - it’s a trade-off.
Dual-sided liquidity, meanwhile, keeps earning fees no matter where the price goes. But if ETH crashes 40%, your 18% APY turns into a net loss. One user lost $1,200 in impermanent loss on a $5,000 ETH/USDC position - even after collecting $900 in fees.
Who Should Use Which Model?
If you’re new to DeFi and only hold one asset - say, USDC or DOT - single-sided is your best bet. MEXC’s survey of 1,247 users found 61.3% of beginners preferred it because they didn’t have to buy a second token. It’s simpler. Safer. Less confusing.
But if you’re experienced, have $10,000+ in positions, and understand volatility? Dual-sided still has its place. Especially with volatile pairs like ETH/BTC. You can’t predict where the price will go. So you don’t try to guess a range. You just let the pool do its job.
For stablecoins? Stick with single-sided. USDC, USDT, DAI - these move less than 1% in a week. Set your range at ±0.5% and let the fees roll in. In September 2023, over 68% of single-sided TVL was in stablecoin pairs.
For high-risk, high-reward tokens? Use both. Put 70% of your capital in a narrow-range single-sided pool. Keep 30% in a dual-sided pool as insurance. That’s what top LPs do. It’s not an either/or decision anymore. It’s a strategy.
Tools and Tips for Managing Liquidity
Managing single-sided liquidity isn’t plug-and-play. You need to monitor your range. Rebalance when the price moves. Watch gas fees. Here’s what works:
- Range setting: For volatile tokens (ETH, SOL), use ±15-20% from current price. For stablecoins, use ±0.5-1%.
- Rebalancing: Use tools like Zapper.fi or Token Terminal to get alerts when your position is near the edge.
- Gas costs: Don’t rebalance every day. Wait until the price is 5% outside your range. Frequent swaps eat into profits.
- Oracles: Make sure the protocol uses Chainlink or another trusted oracle. 85% of single-sided protocols rely on it for accurate pricing.
- TVL check: Look at DeFi Llama. If a pool has less than $5 million in TVL, avoid it. Low liquidity means high slippage and higher risk.
Uniswap’s documentation scores 4.3/5 for clarity. Newer protocols? Not so much. Pendle’s interface scores 3.1/5. Stick with the big names unless you’re ready to dig into code.
The Future: Hybrid Models Are Winning
The debate isn’t “single-sided vs dual-sided.” It’s “how do you use both?”
By 2025, 78% of new DeFi protocols will combine both models. Bancor’s v3.1, launched in September 2023, now offers “elastic impermanent loss protection” - automatically adjusting to reduce losses when volatility spikes. GammaXYZ, a startup founded in 2022, manages $412 million in single-sided positions across Uniswap v3, using AI to rebalance ranges in real time.
Delphi Digital predicts single-sided liquidity will make up 45-50% of all DeFi liquidity by the end of 2024. That’s up from 32.4% in September 2023. But dual-sided isn’t dying. It’s evolving. Institutional players still need deep pools for large trades. Retail users need simplicity. The future isn’t one model replacing the other. It’s both working together.
By 2026, experts at a-Crypto think single-sided will dominate 60-70% of volatile asset pools. Galaxy Digital warns that dual-sided remains essential for assets where price prediction is impossible. Both are right. The best strategy? Know your asset. Know your risk. Know your range.
What is the main advantage of single-sided liquidity?
The main advantage is that you only need to deposit one token, eliminating the need to buy or hold a second asset. This reduces barriers to entry and cuts impermanent loss risk by up to 58.7% compared to dual-sided pools, according to Vitalik Buterin’s 2022 analysis.
Can you lose money with single-sided liquidity?
Yes, but not from impermanent loss on the deposited asset. You can lose money if your price range is too narrow and the market moves outside it - your liquidity stops earning fees. You can also lose if you pay too much in gas fees rebalancing too often, or if the token you deposited drops in value.
Why do dual-sided pools have higher APY?
Dual-sided pools earn fees on every trade, regardless of price movement. Since they cover the entire price curve, they’re more active in volatile markets. But higher APY often comes with higher impermanent loss - sometimes wiping out the fee earnings entirely.
Is single-sided liquidity safe for beginners?
Yes, if you stick to stablecoins like USDC and use tight ranges (±0.5-1%). MEXC’s 2023 survey found 61.3% of beginners preferred single-sided because it’s simpler and doesn’t require buying a second token. Avoid volatile pairs until you understand how price ranges work.
What’s the best protocol for single-sided liquidity in 2025?
Uniswap v4 is the most advanced, thanks to its hook system that allows automated rebalancing and dynamic fees. Bancor offers built-in impermanent loss protection. For ease of use, stick with Uniswap v3 or v4 on Ethereum or Polygon. Avoid lesser-known protocols with low TVL or poor documentation.
How often should I rebalance my single-sided liquidity position?
Only rebalance when the price moves 5-10% outside your range. Rebalancing too often eats into profits through gas fees. Use tools like Zapper.fi to set alerts. For stablecoins, you might only need to rebalance once every few weeks. For volatile assets, check daily.
Does single-sided liquidity work on all blockchains?
It’s available on Ethereum (Uniswap v3/v4), BNB Chain (PancakeSwap v3), Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. Most major chains now support concentrated liquidity. Avoid newer or low-traffic chains - they lack liquidity and have higher slippage.
Ninad Mulay
November 17, 2025 AT 16:52Bro, single-sided is the future. I put all my USDC in a ±0.5% range on Uniswap v3 last year and made more than my job in 6 months. No ETH, no drama, just chillin’ while the fees roll in. 🚀
Mike Calwell
November 18, 2025 AT 07:41lol i tried it once and my position got frozen for 3 days. wasted gas on a rebalance that did nothing. single sided is just a trap for people who dont know what they’re doing.
Carol Wyss
November 18, 2025 AT 22:16I get why you’re frustrated, Mike 😊 But honestly, it’s not about the tech being a trap-it’s about matching it to your style. If you’re not watching charts daily, stick to stablecoins with tight ranges. I started with USDC and now I’m hooked. It’s like passive income with a safety net.
Ryan Hansen
November 20, 2025 AT 13:53Let’s be real-this whole debate is missing the bigger picture. Single-sided liquidity isn’t just a feature; it’s a paradigm shift in how capital is deployed. In traditional finance, you’d never tie up half your portfolio in an asset you don’t believe in just to earn yield. DeFi is finally catching up to the idea of capital efficiency. Uniswap v3’s concentrated liquidity model is basically the crypto version of high-frequency market-making, but democratized. And v4’s hooks? That’s the API layer of DeFi becoming programmable money. We’re not just earning fees anymore-we’re writing financial logic. The real innovation isn’t the one-token deposit-it’s that you can now automate your exposure without needing a quant team. But here’s the catch: most users still treat it like a savings account. They set a range, forget it, and panic when the price moves. That’s not how it works. It’s a dynamic instrument. You need to monitor, adjust, and understand the asymmetry between fee capture and impermanent loss exposure. And yeah, gas costs still suck. But if you’re on Polygon or Arbitrum, and you rebalance only when the price hits 7% outside your range, you’re doing better than 90% of LPs. The real winners aren’t the ones who chase 20% APY-they’re the ones who preserve capital while collecting fees consistently over time.
Jay Davies
November 21, 2025 AT 16:51Actually, the claim that single-sided reduces impermanent loss by 58.7% is misleading. Buterin’s analysis was based on a specific simulation with stablecoin pairs and narrow ranges. In volatile asset pairs like ETH/USDT, the risk profile flips-your single-sided position becomes idle far more often, and the opportunity cost exceeds the saved impermanent loss. Dual-sided still wins on total fee capture over long cycles. Also, ‘70% of TVL in stablecoins’ doesn’t mean single-sided is dominant-it means stablecoins are the only safe playground for retail. The real metric is net yield after fees, slippage, and rebalance costs. Most studies ignore that.
Grace Craig
November 23, 2025 AT 13:00One must acknowledge the profound epistemological rupture that concentrated liquidity represents within the ontological framework of decentralized finance. The classical liquidity provision model-rooted in the Aristotelian notion of proportional exchange-is now superseded by a Heideggerian mode of being-in-the-market, wherein capital is no longer inertly pooled but dynamically contextualized within price-time continua. The aesthetic of passive income has been replaced by the ethical imperative of algorithmic attunement. To deploy liquidity without understanding hooks, oracles, and range elasticity is not merely negligent-it is an existential misalignment with the spirit of Web3.
Sean Pollock
November 23, 2025 AT 18:44Grace, you sound like you just read a whitepaper written by a philosophy professor who got into crypto after a bad breakup. 😂 Single-sided liquidity isn’t ‘ontological’-it’s just a way to not buy ETH when you don’t want to. Stop overcomplicating it. Also, your grammar’s perfect but your vibe’s cringe. 🤡
Derayne Stegall
November 24, 2025 AT 17:41YOOOOO I JUST MADE $800 IN 2 WEEKS WITH USDC ON UNISWAP V4!!! 🤑🔥 WHO NEEDS A JOB?!?!?!!11! ONE! LOVE! ONE! LIFI! 🚀💎
Shanell Nelly
November 25, 2025 AT 04:06Derayne, that’s awesome! 🎉 But just a friendly heads-up-don’t forget to check your range every few days. I saw someone else post about their position going idle after a 3% move, and they didn’t notice until they lost 3 weeks of fees. You’re doing great, but consistency > hype. Keep it up!
Student Teacher
November 26, 2025 AT 11:51Wait-so if I’m holding DOT and don’t want to buy ATOM, I can just put my DOT in a single-sided pool? And it’ll automatically convert to ATOM when trades happen? That’s wild. So… I don’t need to understand the price movements at all? Just set a range and walk away?
Astor Digital
November 28, 2025 AT 05:18Student Teacher, it’s not that simple. If your range is too wide, you’re just doing dual-sided with extra steps. Too narrow, and you’re sitting on the sidelines when the market moves. I tried it with DOT last month-set it at ±10%, price dropped 12%, and I earned $0 for 11 days. Had to rebalance manually. Took me 3 hours and $18 in gas. Felt like I got scammed. But when it works? Pure magic. I’d say: start small. Use Zapper to auto-alert you. And never, ever trust a protocol with less than $10M TVL. Been there, lost that.