FATF Blacklist: Why Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar Are Targeted for Crypto Bans

FATF Blacklist: Why Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar Are Targeted for Crypto Bans
21 November 2025 9 Comments Yolanda Niepagen

FATF Blacklist Comparison Tool

Compare Illicit Crypto Activities

See the scale of crypto-related illicit activities in FATF-listed countries. Data based on 2024 Chainalysis reports and official FATF documentation.

North Korea

Total Illicit Transactions $7.9B+
Share of Global Illicit Crypto 40%+

Iran

Total Illicit Transactions $6.3B+
Transaction Volume Increase 300% (2024)

Myanmar

Total Illicit Transactions $1.6B+
Transaction Spike (2023) 220%

Key Insights

North Korea

Responsible for over 50% of illicit crypto transactions from FATF blacklisted nations. Largest single crypto heist ($1.5B from ByBit in 2025).

Iran

300% transaction surge in 2024. People use crypto to escape sanctions, but regime uses it for terrorism financing and sanction-busting.

Myanmar

220% spike after 2021 coup. Junta relies on third-party criminals to move money for weapons and surveillance tech.

When you hear about crypto bans, you might think of governments cracking down on everyday users. But the real story isn’t about people trading Bitcoin in their living rooms. It’s about state-backed cybercriminals stealing billions - and the global system trying to stop them. The FATF blacklist isn’t a warning label for shady exchanges. It’s a red alert for countries actively using cryptocurrency to bypass sanctions, fund terrorism, and finance weapons programs.

Who’s on the FATF blacklist - and why it matters

As of June 2025, only three countries sit on the Financial Action Task Force’s highest-risk list: Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar. These aren’t random picks. They’re nations with weak financial controls, active state involvement in illicit finance, and no meaningful cooperation with international watchdogs.

The FATF doesn’t just list them. It tells every bank, exchange, and payment processor in the world: apply extra scrutiny or cut ties entirely. For Iran and North Korea, that means full countermeasures - essentially a financial quarantine. Myanmar faces strict due diligence rules, but not yet the same level of isolation.

This isn’t about punishing citizens. It’s about cutting off the financial lifelines of regimes that rely on crypto to survive. And right now, cryptocurrency is their weapon of choice.

North Korea: The world’s most dangerous crypto hacker

North Korea doesn’t just use crypto. It runs it like a war economy.

In February 2025, hackers linked to the North Korean government stole $1.5 billion from ByBit - the largest single crypto heist ever recorded. That’s not an anomaly. It’s their business model.

Chainalysis data shows sanctioned countries pulled in $15.8 billion in cryptocurrency in 2024. Nearly 40% of all illicit crypto transactions globally came from just these three FATF blacklisted nations. And North Korea alone is responsible for over half of that.

Their operations are professional. They recruit coders, run phishing campaigns targeting crypto firms, and use stolen funds to buy weapons, pay soldiers, and fund nuclear programs. The U.S. Treasury has documented over 13 crypto-related sanctions in 2024 - the second-highest number in seven years. Most of those targeted North Korean addresses.

What makes this worse? North Korea doesn’t need to hide its tracks. They know most exchanges still lack proper monitoring. And many countries still don’t enforce FATF rules - leaving backdoors wide open.

Iran: Crypto as a survival tool - and a sanction-busting scheme

Iran’s situation is more complex. Many Iranians use crypto not to break laws, but to survive.

Years of U.S. and international sanctions have crippled their banking system. Inflation hit 50% in 2024. People can’t access their savings. Foreign currency is nearly impossible to get. So they turn to Bitcoin and Ethereum - not because they believe in decentralization, but because it works when banks don’t.

Iranian exchanges saw a 300% surge in transaction volume in 2024. Outflows jumped even higher. People are moving money out of the country, using crypto as a digital escape hatch. A seed phrase is all you need to take your life savings across borders - no bank approval, no paperwork.

But here’s the dark side: the Iranian government and its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are deeply involved. They operate state-backed crypto mining farms, launder funds through mixers, and use decentralized platforms to evade detection. The U.S. has sanctioned over 20 Iranian crypto addresses since 2023. FinCEN has flagged multiple Iranian-linked mixing services as high-risk.

So while ordinary Iranians use crypto for survival, the regime uses it to fund terrorism and evade sanctions. And that’s why the FATF keeps Iran on the list.

North Korean hacker in a hoodie with holographic screens showing stolen billions and nuclear weapons.

Myanmar: A junta’s digital money trail

Myanmar’s case is the newest and least understood. After the 2021 military coup, the junta lost access to global banking. They turned to crypto - fast.

Crypto transactions into Myanmar spiked by 220% in 2023 and stayed high through 2024. Much of it flows through unregulated peer-to-peer platforms and offshore exchanges. The junta uses these funds to buy weapons, pay militias, and finance surveillance tech.

Unlike North Korea, Myanmar doesn’t have the same level of technical expertise. But they don’t need it. They rely on third-party criminals - ransomware gangs, darknet vendors, and unlicensed exchanges - to move money. The FATF doesn’t yet call for full countermeasures against Myanmar, but it demands enhanced due diligence from all financial institutions dealing with the country.

The problem? Most banks and crypto firms outside Asia still don’t screen for Myanmar-linked activity. That gap is exactly what the junta is counting on.

Why global compliance is failing

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: most countries aren’t doing their part.

As of April 2024, 75% of FATF member countries were either noncompliant or only partially compliant with global standards for virtual asset regulation. That means most exchanges, wallet providers, and payment processors aren’t checking if users are from sanctioned countries. They’re not tracking suspicious transfers. They’re not reporting high-risk activity.

This isn’t just negligence. It’s systemic failure. Many countries lack the resources. Others lack the will. Some even benefit from the flow of dirty money.

Mixers - services that obscure the origin of crypto funds - are the biggest loophole. Criminals use them to turn stolen coins into untraceable cash. FinCEN has tried to shut down major mixers like Huione Group, but new ones pop up daily. Privacy coins like Monero and Zcash make tracking even harder.

The U.S., Netherlands, and other leading nations are stepping up. They’re training foreign financial units through programs like CIFT (Counter Illicit Finance Teams). They’re pressuring exchanges to block sanctioned addresses. But progress is slow.

Iranian family sending crypto for medicine while shadowy figures mine coins for the regime in a dual-panel scene.

What this means for regular crypto users

You might wonder: does this affect me?

Yes. If you’re using a global exchange like Binance, Coinbase, or Kraken, you’ve probably already been affected. These platforms now block users from Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar. They freeze accounts linked to known blacklisted addresses. They require extra ID checks.

That’s not overreach. It’s compliance. And it’s necessary. If you’re a regular user in a safe country, you’re not being targeted. You’re being protected - from criminals who use crypto to fund war and oppression.

But here’s the catch: if you’re in Iran or Myanmar and you’re using crypto to send money to family, or to buy medicine, you’re caught in the crossfire. There’s no easy solution. The system doesn’t distinguish between the desperate and the dangerous.

The future of crypto and sanctions

The FATF isn’t backing down. In June 2025, they added the British Virgin Islands and Bolivia to their list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring. That means more scrutiny, more reporting, more pressure on exchanges.

The next phase? Real-time blockchain analysis. Regulators are building AI tools that can flag suspicious transactions before they complete. They’re pushing for mandatory KYC on all peer-to-peer platforms. And they’re working with blockchain analytics firms like Chainalysis and Elliptic to build global watchlists.

But technology alone won’t fix this. Governments must enforce the rules. Exchanges must stop cutting corners. And the global community must stop treating crypto as a lawless frontier.

Crypto isn’t the problem. The lack of rules is.

For now, the FATF blacklist remains the most powerful tool we have. It’s not perfect. It’s not fair to every citizen in those countries. But it’s the only thing standing between rogue regimes and a completely unregulated global crypto economy.

9 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Kaitlyn Boone

    November 21, 2025 AT 11:41
    they dont even check if youre from iran anymore. i sent 0.05 btc to my cousin last week and it went through. no flag, no freeze. the system is broken.
  • Image placeholder

    Natalie Reichstein

    November 22, 2025 AT 19:58
    This isn't about sanctions. It's about control. The same governments that preach freedom are the ones blocking people from using the only financial tool left to them. You want to stop crime? Go after the mixers. Don't punish mothers buying insulin because their bank froze their account. The FATF is just a fancy name for moral panic dressed in compliance.
  • Image placeholder

    Kris Young

    November 23, 2025 AT 01:00
    I agree with Natalie. The system is punishing the innocent because the guilty are too smart to get caught. Every time an exchange blocks a user from Iran, it’s not stopping a terrorist-it’s stopping a teacher trying to pay for her daughter’s medicine. We need smarter tools, not broader bans.
  • Image placeholder

    LaTanya Orr

    November 24, 2025 AT 06:08
    There’s a difference between a regime and a person and the system refuses to see it. Crypto was supposed to liberate people from broken institutions. Now those same institutions are using crypto’s power to lock people out. It’s ironic. It’s tragic. And honestly? It’s not working.
  • Image placeholder

    Ashley Finlert

    November 24, 2025 AT 20:50
    The tragedy of this moment is not that rogue states exploit crypto-it’s that the global community, in its righteous indignation, has chosen to weaponize financial exclusion rather than innovate toward precision enforcement. We have the technology to trace, to flag, to isolate-but we choose the blunt instrument because it is easier than the scalpel. And in doing so, we betray the very ideals we claim to defend.
  • Image placeholder

    Marilyn Manriquez

    November 26, 2025 AT 17:24
    I think we need to stop thinking of this as a crypto problem and start thinking of it as a human problem. People are not their governments. And when we treat them like they are, we lose the moral high ground. We become the very thing we say we’re fighting.
  • Image placeholder

    taliyah trice

    November 27, 2025 AT 19:02
    my aunt in tehran uses crypto to get her pills. she’s not a hacker. she’s just trying to live.
  • Image placeholder

    Peter Mendola

    November 29, 2025 AT 05:37
    If you're not KYC'd, you're part of the problem. 🚫
  • Image placeholder

    James Edwin

    November 30, 2025 AT 18:57
    We’re not talking about stopping crime here-we’re talking about stopping survival. The FATF’s blacklist is like putting a lock on the only door left in a burning building. Yeah, the arsonist might be inside, but so are the kids, the elderly, the sick. We need to fix the fire, not block the exit. This isn’t justice. It’s collateral damage on a global scale.

Write a comment